[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Weird issue with interceptors

[adrian@jboss.org]

Re: reopened EJBTHREE-1111

Ok, I misread the spec. The requirement in the spec to implement the remote interface
is for the EJBContainer to do on the proxy.

I was actually looking up what it said about the return type (see above)
when I saw that line and misinterpreted it.
In hindsight its obviously wrong, since it wasn't even true in EJB2.1

But at least the test is passing, so I'll know where I break things
when I do annotation/metadata refactoring. ;-)

It's most interesting because it fixes a test that looks at the transaction timeout
config from jboss.xml

I'll leave EJBTHREE-1111 open until we find out the real fix is found.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105020#4105020

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105020