[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1114 - Cache passivation test and generics agai

[ALRubinger]

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : 1) The changes for the Pool/Cache registry broke the test 

Yes, missed this as the test was also broken before these changes were made.

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : 3) The use of generics in the new Pool/Cache registry was/is wrong/stupid 

Agreed.  In addition to the changes you'd made to enable programmatic use of the Registry/Factories, I further cleaned this up in Revision 67175.  Thanks for pointing it out.

S,
ALR

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105531#4105531

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105531