[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-786

[pete.muir@jboss.org]

So, from the Seam perspective: 

* very few users have EJB2 views and most are going to be using *just* EJB3

* making them put @JBossEJBStuff on every interface/class isn't very nice so I would like to avoid this if at all possible.

* We still have the corner case of a user wanting both EJB2 and to use the Seam framework (maybe this is something we document as just not working for now)

I have a feeling a global metadata with an annotation either way (@NoEjb2View, @Ejb2View) could work? What the default is I don't know. I would argue for NoEjb2View obviously, but I don't know if that works for the TCK (it sounds from Bill like it does). 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4090755#4090755

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4090755