[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-786

[bdecoste]

The suggestion to only have the proxy implement EJBObject if the Remote interface extends it is the only one that makes any sense. As I've said, if they want EJB2.1 clients they already have to create a home interface so it's not an inconvenience. And we can work through whatever TCK problems that may arise. I second the motion.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4090765#4090765

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4090765