[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: The default local interface (vs. EJBTHREE-785)

[bill.burke@jboss.com]

The letter of the law is, if the bean's implementation does not match the default pattern (implements one interface that isn't declared remote or local), then you must be explicit on what the Remote and/or local interface is.  Its pretty simple and clear to me.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093119#4093119

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093119