[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: So what does unification mean for the ejb containers

[wolfc]

"alex.loubyansky at jboss.com" wrote : Also currently jboss_5_0.xsd has http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee as the target namespace which I think should be changed to a JBoss one.
I've got a first draft of a new jboss_5_0.xsd in jboss-metadata. I'm not yet happy with:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
  | <jboss
  |       version="3.0" 
  |       xmlns="http://www.jboss.com/xml/ns/javaee" 
  |       xmlns:javaee="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" 
  |       xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
  |       xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.jboss.com/xml/ns/javaee 
  |                           http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/schema/jboss_5_0.xsd 
  |                           http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee 
  |                           http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/ejb-jar_3_0.xsd">
  |    <enterprise-beans>
  |       <session>
  |          <javaee:ejb-name>StatefulOverrideBean</javaee:ejb-name>
  |          <jndi-name>StatefulOverride</jndi-name>
  |       </session>
  |    </enterprise-beans>
  | </jboss>
Either I take ejb-nameType into jboss namespace or convince everybody that this is the way. After that is resolved, I'll commit.

Note that the unit tests in jboss-metadata did not pick this up. I found out in trunk that stuff was going haywire.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4094610#4094610

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4094610