[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-786

[wolfc]

"ALRubinger" wrote : 
  | "wolfc" wrote : How about we take out the explicit binding of EJBObject in the proxy factories. If one of the interfaces extends EJBObject it'll be picked up again.
  | We've now taken the explicit binding of EJBObject out of the Proxy factories, but again, since the business interfaces cannot extend EJBObject, we're now in the position where no Proxy object ever implements EJBObject; local/remote interfaces are impossible.
  | 
If I have:
interface MyRemoteBusiness {}
  | 
  | interface MyRemoteHome extends EJBHome {}
  | 
  | interface MyRemote extends EJBObject {}
The proxy implements both MyRemoteBusiness and MyRemote (optionally also MyRemoteHome). So in effect it will implement EJBObject.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4096005#4096005

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4096005