[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Generalizing supply/demand

[scott.stark@jboss.org]

"alesj" wrote : 
  | Uf. :-)
  | btw: why not?
  | 
Because its unnecessary busy work. What's the point of a multi-container kernel if you don't use multiple container types? 


'ales' wrote : 
  | It can't. :-)
  | It can only demand whatever with legacy 'demand' element.
  | I have no objections with moving demand/supply notion to our dependency module. Although this bloats simple 'state machine' impl in dependency.
If supply/demand are to be mc bean specific it simply cannot be used as a cross-container mechanism. It seems like this can be replaced with a dependency on an alias, in which case, that is how the mc supply/demand should be implemented.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4100473#4100473

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4100473