[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC meets Drools - new Reliance module

[alesj]

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : Why don't you call the project dependency-rules?
  | Then later you can have a dependency-jbpm or dependency-xxxx

Hmm, I like your idea, perhaps only the name dependency is not quite right, since it's not a clear extension of the dependency module - like your deployers, where every deployers-sub-module is extension of previous.
In my case I have mixture of all MC modules - dependency, kernel, aop, deployers, ...

Is reliance-rules, reliance-xxxx, ... still ok?

Currently I'll split them into three things I have done:
 (a) reliance-identity
 (b) reliance-rules (depends on (a))
 (c) reliance-jbpm (wip)



View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080512#4080512

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080512