[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Transport Use Cases

[david.lloyd@jboss.com]

"trustin" wrote : I agree with you that it's of dubious value to provide additional transports considering the current set of implemented transports.
  | 
  | BTW, it sounds like Remoting is not for interoperability between various parties but for efficient and full-featured communication between only Remoting clients and servers.  Did I understand correctly?

You are correct.

"trustin" wrote : and out of curiosity, is it what users want?

Well, we've had a tough time getting user input thus far.  Hopefully next week will shed some light.  The current state of Remoting 3 is based on all the feedback I've been able to locate about earlier versions thus far.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4086390#4086390

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4086390