[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossXB] - Re: JBossXB-2.0.0.CR5

[alex.loubyansky@jboss.com]

That's 8 errors and 7 failures.
I see the same plus
Test set: org.jboss.test.xb.builder.object.mc.test.MapTestCase
  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.943 sec <<< FAILURE!
  | testMapWithValue(org.jboss.test.xb.builder.object.mc.test.MapTestCase)  Time elapsed: 0.02 sec  <<< FAILURE!
  | junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
  | 	at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
  | 	at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
  | 	at junit.framework.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:220)
  | 	at junit.framework.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:213)
  | 	at org.jboss.test.xb.builder.object.mc.test.AbstractMCTest.assertValue(AbstractMCTest.java:199)
  | 	at org.jboss.test.xb.builder.object.mc.test.MapTestCase.testMapWithValue(MapTestCase.java:93)
  | 	at org.jboss.test.xb.builder.object.mc.test.MapTestCase.testMapWithValue(MapTestCase.java:93)
  | 

And I just committed the fix for proxy-factory-config issue. And I think the JBXB-109 can be closed now.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4088894#4088894

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4088894