[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: jndi name issues

[ALRubinger]

"wolfc" wrote : It should work as follows: 
  | 
  | By default beans are bound in JNDI in the form "", regardless which interfaces are defined on the bean.
  | Depending on whether an EJB3 deployment is packaged within an EAR the JNDI name will be prepended by the short name of the EAR. So for foo.ear/bar.jar/MyBean it will become "foo/MyBean". 

This should be handled by the JndiBindingPolicy, and the default in place is currently an implementation of the legacy.

If we change the format "earName/jarName/beanName" to "earName/beanName", we lose the guarantee that the binding will be unique.  Why remove "jarName" from here?

Remember, JndiBindingPolicy is in place to handle cases we haven't considered or need further definition.  EJBs deployed in webapps need to be unique per WAR, for instance.

"wolfc" wrote : The final JNDI name can be overriden with the use of @LocalBinding, @RemoteBinding or the equivalents from jboss.xml. 

Yes, but XML must override our annotations.  So the hierarchy is:

JndiBindingPolicy > @RemoteBinding.jndiBinding/@LocalBinding.jndiBinding > jboss.xml

S,
ALR

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4147560#4147560

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4147560