[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: R3 transports to implement
david.lloyd@jboss.com
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Mon Aug 4 13:12:52 EDT 2008
"ron.sigal at jboss.com" wrote : "david.lloyd at jboss.com" wrote :
| | 2bb. we would have to provide a Remoting 2 facade for Remoting 3 so that InvokeRemoteInterceptor doesn't need to know which version of Remoting is running.
| |
|
| A "2bc." could be to go with the original plan to provide a Remoting 3 facade for Remoting 2 invocations. Then the invoker client would simply always use Remoting 3 and it use the service discovery mechanism to figure out how the request moves across the wire.
|
| A similar thing could be done on the server side: create an emulation service that receives invocations and forwards them to a Remoting 3 RequestHandler.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4168536#4168536
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4168536
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list