[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: R3 transports to implement

[david.lloyd@jboss.com]

"ron.sigal at jboss.com" wrote : "david.lloyd at jboss.com" wrote : 
  |   | 2bb. we would have to provide a Remoting 2 facade for Remoting 3 so that InvokeRemoteInterceptor doesn't need to know which version of Remoting is running.
  |   | 
  | 
  | A "2bc." could be to go with the original plan to provide a Remoting 3 facade for Remoting 2 invocations.  Then the invoker client would simply always use Remoting 3 and it use the service discovery mechanism to figure out how the request moves across the wire.
  | 
  | A similar thing could be done on the server side: create an emulation service that receives invocations and forwards them to a Remoting 3 RequestHandler.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4168536#4168536

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4168536