[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: ServiceMetaData has the most recent dependencies/attribu

[anil.saldhana@jboss.com]

This week I have rewritten the Security Deployer (or more precisely to split into deployers based on the type of metadata). It is ready and I am checking it in tomorrow.

The classes look as follows:

  | public abstract class AbstractSecurityDeployer<T extends IdMetaData> 
  | extends AbstractDeployer
  | {
  |     public AbstractSecurityDeployer()
  |    {
  |       setStage(DeploymentStages.POST_CLASSLOADER); 
  |       ...
  |       setOutput(ServiceMetaData.class);
  |       ...
  |     }
  | }
  | 
  | public class EarSecurityDeployer extends AbstractSecurityDeployer<JBossAppMetaData>
  | { 
  | }
  | 
  | public class EjbSecurityDeployer 
  | extends AbstractSecurityDeployer<JBossMetaData>
  | {}
  | 
  | public class WarSecurityDeployer extends AbstractSecurityDeployer<JBossWebMetaData>
  | { }
  | 

An issue that exists for addDependencies/addAttributes api addition to ServiceMetaData is that the internal data structures are Lists (rather than Sets) and hence there can be duplication of dependencies. 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4130920#4130920

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4130920