[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: SpecialValueFactoryUnitTestCase failure

[adrian@jboss.org]

I would update the test to this:

  |    public Map<String, String> compositeSignature;
  |    
  |    public void testMapComposite() throws Exception
  |    {
  |       Field field = getClass().getField("compositeSignature");
  |       Type mapSignature = field.getGenericType();
  |       CompositeMetaType result = assertInstanceOf(resolve(mapSignature), CompositeMetaType.class);
  |       MutableCompositeMetaType expected = new MutableCompositeMetaType(HashMap.class.getName(), "HashMap<String,String>");
  |       expected.addItem("key1", "key1", SimpleMetaType.STRING);
  |       expected.addItem("key2", "key2", SimpleMetaType.STRING);
  |       expected.addItem("key3", "key3", SimpleMetaType.STRING);
  |       expected.freeze();
  |       
  |       testComposite(expected, result);
  | 
  |       String[] itemNames = {"key1", "key2", "key3"};
  |       MetaValue[] itemValues = {SimpleValueSupport.wrap("value1"), SimpleValueSupport.wrap("value3"), SimpleValueSupport.wrap("value3")};
  |       CompositeValueSupport mapValue = new CompositeValueSupport(expected, itemNames, itemValues);
  |       assertEquals("value1", mapValue.get("key1"));
  |    }
  | 

Your test will never work, since:

  | new HashMap<String,String>().getClass()
  | 
will just return the erased type, not the generic type.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131470#4131470

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4131470