[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Implicit marshalled values - a better way of handling re

[manik.surtani@jboss.com]

"manik.surtani at jboss.com" wrote : 
  | 
  | +100.  Hugely limiting in the way we have to support custom objects in Fqns right now.  
  | 

And slow too.  A large percentage of time spent marshalling calls is spent marshalling Fqns as individual elements so we can allow for custom objects.

I'd like to make this a priority for 3.x, to restrict Fqn elements to {String, byte, short, int, long, float, double, char, boolean}.  Thoughts?



View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4117089#4117089

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4117089