[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: Is profile-service.xml misnamed?

[scott.stark@jboss.org]

"PeterJ" wrote : Ales hinted that he doesn't have enough to do and that I should post this here.  ;-)
  | 
  | Are there any plans to provide a system property that can be used to decide whether to use bootstrap.xml or boostrap-repo.xml? Right now bootstrap.xml is hard-coded and I had to rename the files to use bootstrap-repo.xml. (Also, is it expected that when using boostrap-repo.xml that hot deployment does not work?)
  | 
Yes, we should have something, http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5760. Note that there already is a ServerConfig.BOOTSTRAP_URL = jboss.bootstrap.url that should be used.

"PeterJ" wrote : 
  | On a related note, why is profile-service.xml not called simply profile.xml? The extension -service.xml is usually associated with JMX, but in this case the file is used with the microcontainer. I know that file naming conventions (e.g., *-service.xml) apply only in the deploy directory, and not in conf, but it can be initially confusing.
  | 
Fair enough. The conventions apply to any deployments processed by the deployers, so its the deployers, deploy directories. We might as well be consistent in naming conventions. http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5761

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4163941#4163941

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4163941