[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: R3 transports to implement

[ron.sigal@jboss.com]

"trustin" wrote : 
  | I'm not following this. Could you explain a little bit further? Regarding 1a, I thought what we need to do is to run two Remoting versions (2 and 3) which calls local EJB3?
  | 

I didn't express myself well.  I meant that for Remoting 2, calls on an EJB3 would go to AOPRemotingInvocationHandler, and for Remoting 3, they would go to something new, an "AOPRemotingRequestListener", maybe.  Of course the EJB3 code itself would be the same.  But there would be two paths to the same EJB3.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167344#4167344

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167344