[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: R3 transports to implement
trustin
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Tue Jul 29 22:43:09 EDT 2008
"ron.sigal at jboss.com" wrote : 1. 1b+2ba should be our minimal goal, and
|
| 2. hiding everything inside Remoting proper is preferable, since it better serves standalone users.
|
| The latter seems to imply a "socket" transport in Remoting 3.
The 'socket' transport here is the R2-compatible transport rather than the backward incompatible R3 socket transport, right?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167483#4167483
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167483
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list