[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: ProfileService equiv to ServiceBindingManager

[bstansberry@jboss.com]

That's certainly cleaner, both in terms of implementation and in clarity for a user looking at the config file.

As for handling mbeans, options in ascending order of effort are:

1) Continue to support the current mechanism where org.jboss.system.microcontainer.ConfigureAction calls into the binding manager. Clunky but supports existing end-user custom mbean services with no change on their end required.

2) Convert mbeans services with ports to pojos w/ @JMX.  For our own services, a good thing to do anyway in most if not all cases.

3) Add support for value-factory to the JMX config. Not sure what that entails.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167596#4167596

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167596