[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: state transfer optimizations - persisitng state with JDB

[manik.surtani@jboss.com]

There could be state on the recipient, since in-memory state is integrated before persistent state.  This is why I suspected that the exists() check is an optimisation, since integrating in-memory state will result in a cache loader put() as well.

And as for passivation, if the state is in-memory (after integrating in-memory state), it won't (and shouldn't) be in the cacheloader.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4155419#4155419

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4155419