[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: Register dynamic class loading with a domain

[sguilhen@redhat.com]

The more we discuss about this the more convinced I become that we should just include the stubs in the war deployments.

First because if you want your component to be a client of an IIOP application you should provide the stubs that will allow your component to make the IIOP calls. I don't see why you would rely on the app server runtime to provide those for you.

Second because of the possibility of abuse that you have just described. I don't think we should include a hack to allow the generation of stubs when someone forgets to add those stubs to the deployments.

When we act as a client, stubs should either be pre-compiled and inserted in the deployment war file or downloaded from a location specified in the IOR (when the server makes such mechanism available). As the RI doesn't make stubs available for download, the only other way left for us is to include the pre-compiled stubs in the vehicles war files. At least this is what I think.

If this makes sense, we should review the way stubs are generated in the ejb container.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157084#4157084

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157084