[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Re: Duplicate jmx remoting in jbossas5

[adrian@jboss.org]

"dimitris at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | I think people want that because it's the standard way now to access remotely an mbeanserver using service url:
  | 
  | service:jmx:rmi://127.0.0.1/jndi/rmi://127.0.0.1:1090/jmxconnector
  | 
  | In this regard, I don't see how they can be merged in an mcbean implementation?
  | 
  | Or maybe we can retire RMIAdaptor.

You should be able to bind the JSR160 MBeanServerConnection
in place of the RMIAdapter - assuming you're not bothered about implementing
the old interfaces?

But I think you'll find classloading issues? I don't think it will understand how
to unmarshal objects into scoped deployments 
see InvokerAdapterService::invoke

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160325#4160325

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160325