[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of the JBoss EJB Container] - Re: Question about Remoting, Marshalling, and EJBs

[timfox]

"ron.sigal at jboss.com" wrote : 
  | 1. Does anyone care about having this feature?
  | 
  | 2. This change would mean that the InvocationMarshaller would be used on the server side when returning a response and InvocationUnMarshaller would be used on the client side to unmarshal the response. Would adding and removing transaction context in the server-to-client direction have any implications?
  | 
  | 3. Since EJB3 handles transaction information in an interceptor and doesn't, by default, configure any marshaller or unmarshaller, am I right that this issue is irrelevant to EJB3?
  | 
  | 

>From JBM POV, we only use the bisocket and http transports, so as long as it doesn't effect those transports, we don't care

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135268#4135268

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4135268