[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: TransactionTimeoutConfiguration pluggability
jhalliday
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Wed Mar 19 10:42:23 EDT 2008
> It is an optional extension interface to the TransactionManager.
In that case should it not be declared as
public interface TransactionTimeoutConfiguration extends TransactionManager
Right now nothing in the integration spi that forces implementations to use the the same object to provide both. Therefore making that assumption in the test is a bad thing.
> Either leave it failing with a "FIXME JBAS-5081" in the error message that the test produces.
> Or if it is stopping a release add it to the "bad.tests.exclude" section.
Well it is going into AS branch 4.2 initially and since we don't have any releases planned from that, leaving it failing should not be a problem. Trunk is more of a problem, I don't know if our new JBossTS release will be out before AS 5 CR1. Probably best to exclude it for that.
Thanks
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137786#4137786
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137786
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list