[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: TransactionTimeoutConfiguration pluggability

[adrian@jboss.org]

"jhalliday" wrote : > It is an optional extension interface to the TransactionManager. 
  | 
  | In that case should it not be declared as
  | 
  | public interface TransactionTimeoutConfiguration extends TransactionManager
  | 

No. Because the ConnectionManager only implements TTC not the full TM.

anonymous wrote : 
  | Right now nothing in the integration spi that forces implementations to use the the same object to provide both. Therefore making that assumption in the test is a bad thing.
  | 

If it doesn't implement the interface then don't run the test.


  | public void testSomething()
  | {
  |    Object tm = TransactionManagerLocate.locate();
  |    if (tm instanceof TransactionTimeoutConfiguration)
  |      return; // The interface is optional
  | }
  | 

But if you do implement the interface then it should "do what it says on the tin" ;-)

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137791#4137791

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137791