[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Build broken with new AIO tests

[clebert.suconic@jboss.com]

"ataylor" wrote : anonymous wrote : Shouldn't this be picked up automatically? What am I missing here?
  | 
  | thats what i assumed, am i right in thinking that the only libs that we need are either libJBMLibAIO32.so or libJBMLibAIO64.so or is there something else that needs installing?
  | 
  | Ive updated the standalone distro to ship with these libs so should get used out of the box.
  | 
  | When running the perf examples i get no difference in performance between nio and asyncio, in fact when i set journal-sync to false nio is faster. What should i expect?

On the tests I have done... AIO would be a little bit faster than non Sync (when calling the Storage classes directly), but the same tests also shows the transport is maxing the numbers. (so.. at this point it should be the same) 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149403#4149403

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149403