[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Optimisations: A couple of low hanging fruits going for

jmesnil do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu May 15 10:22:40 EDT 2008


"trustin" wrote : "timfox" wrote : "timfox" wrote : 
  |   |   | Instead I think we should use a variant 2 UUID.
  |   | 
  |   | http://www.webdav.org/specs/draft-leach-uuids-guids-01.txt
  | 
  | This might also be useful:
  | 
  | http://jug.safehaus.org/

Thanks for the link.

Using code from this project, I've substantially improved our perf:
disable jms message: 10133 msg/s
enabled jms message [old code]: 7183 msg/s
enabled jms message [new code]: 9806 msg/s

The same code path is 26% faster and very close to the "disable" case (97%)




View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4151104#4151104

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4151104



More information about the jboss-dev-forums mailing list