[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Optimisations: A couple of low hanging fruits going for
jmesnil
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu May 15 10:22:40 EDT 2008
"trustin" wrote : "timfox" wrote : "timfox" wrote :
| | | Instead I think we should use a variant 2 UUID.
| |
| | http://www.webdav.org/specs/draft-leach-uuids-guids-01.txt
|
| This might also be useful:
|
| http://jug.safehaus.org/
Thanks for the link.
Using code from this project, I've substantially improved our perf:
disable jms message: 10133 msg/s
enabled jms message [old code]: 7183 msg/s
enabled jms message [new code]: 9806 msg/s
The same code path is 26% faster and very close to the "disable" case (97%)
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4151104#4151104
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4151104
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list