[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - JBMICROCONT-380; constructor (property) matching
alesj
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Nov 6 10:02:50 EST 2008
Carlo is complaining about how we match which constructor to use:
- https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-380
Thinking about it, what is really the reason we don't do better
- more exact matching - in InstantiateAction?
As constructor parameter dependencies should already be resolved,
we could eventually pre-invoke that ValueMetaData's to get real parameter values,
and do matching based on that?
Same with other parametrized metadata - property, lifecycle, installs, ...
I'm probably missing something obvious. :-)
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187376#4187376
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187376
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list