[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: MetaValue representation of javax.management.ObjectNames

[emuckenhuber]

"scott.stark at jboss.org" wrote : Looking at the MetaMapper class more, its not a registry of mappers. The static getMetaMapper(TypeInfo typeInfo) method derives the MetaMapper from either an attachment on the TypeInfo, or a MetaMapping annotation on the java type (ClassInfo). I'm not sure what the hooks are for introducing an attachment or an annotation on jdk types like javax.management.ObjectName are. ?

Hmm well i was rather thinking of adding a static registry for types we cannot easily annotate ourself? 
So that this is checked before it tries to the process the annotation.
I think that would be the easiest way - especially for very basic transformations like this.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191490#4191490

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191490