[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Remoting 3: Secure Remote Classloading (JBREM-929)

[alesj]

"david.lloyd at jboss.com" wrote : 
  | Especially if vfsmemory could have a specifiable authority name.  Hint hint. :-)
No. ;-)
I think having separate protocol for remoting and in-memory is better concept wise.
We could independently develop features, but not over doing it on the API.
And I guess we'll have to depend on JBoss Remoting for vfs remoting,
where in-memory is dependency free.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191564#4191564

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191564