[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: removing 2.0 docs?

[kukeltje]

anonymous wrote : http://www.jboss.com/products/jbpm
  | --> this product page should include a big pointer to the jBPM project page http://jbpm.org
  | 

Yep, should be more visible

anonymous wrote : 
  | http://www.jboss.com/products/jbpm/docs and
  | http://www.jboss.com/products/jbpm/docs/*
  | --> should be replaced by http://www.jboss.org/jbossjbpm/jbpm_documentation/
  | 

Hmmm., this link also contains old info... the most recent info is on http://www.jboss.org/jbossjbpm/jpdl_documentation/ so either an additional redirect if you want to keep http://www.jboss.org/jbossjbpm/jbpm_documentation/ But this is not referenced anywhere

http://www.jboss.com/elqNow/elqRedir.htm?ref=/pdf/jbpm_whitepaper.pdf 
 --> is 'old' and referenced from http://www.jboss.com/products/jbpm. Maybe a newer doc should be made

http://www.jboss.com/pdf/jb_jbpm_04_07.pdf
 --> needs updating for the upcomming 3.3 release (jdk 1.4.2 not supported anymore)

http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/ and http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/
 -- > redirects wrongly and should point to either http://www.jboss.org/jbossjbpm/jbpm_documentation/ or http://www.jboss.org/jbossjbpm/jpdl_documentation/ depending on what you choose above

http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v3/demos/movies/jbpm-overview.htm 
  --> is old....

http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v3/userguide/ 
  --> is v3.2 docs (not v3.2.3) so either point to correct most recent docs, but since most likely individual help pages are referenced a lot (http://www.google.nl/search?as_lq=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.jboss.org%2Fjbpm%2Fv3%2Fuserguide&hl=nl&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Anl%3Aofficial&hs=KC2&btnG=Zoeken) it should probaly be kept  or moved with a good redirect


http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/
  -->	shows a location changed which points to http://www.jboss.com/products/jbpm/docs better is to redirect to http://www.jboss.org/jbossjbpm/jpdl_documentation/ 


http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v2/ and http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v2/
 --> EVERYTHING under it should be removed without a redirect so google will ditch it...



View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180006#4180006

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4180006