[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Default JNDI naming scheme in EJB3.0 and possible confli

[ALRubinger]

This is all just because we default the EJB Name in the case it's not specified.

So the workaround is to set it explicitly.

Otherwise we could default the EJB Name to the FQN of the bean impl class, but I think that'll cause more problems (migration) that it'll solve.

S,
ALR

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4183557#4183557

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4183557