[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Server side thread leak?

[galder.zamarreno@jboss.com]

"ron.sigal at jboss.com" wrote : I'm just wondering if UnifiedInvokerProxy was written the way it was, without calling Client.disconnect(), because the typical use case would be to keep making EJB invocations and keep the connections in use.  

I've been wondering about why Tom implemented this in such a way as well but after after looking back at the history of that class, it looks like it's been that way since the very 1st version: http://is.gd/qf2I

I thought it might have been as a result of some perf test or similar but this has been like this since day 1, so I'd imagine it was implemented with the constraints of the first Remoting version integrated in AS.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4222883#4222883

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4222883