[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1800 Improving InjectInterceptorsFactory

[jaikiran]

"jaikiran" wrote : 
  | A bit of improvement in step#4
  | 4) Only if the collection of interceptor classes for this method is non-empty, then go ahead with the check for @InterceptorOrder. If there are no relevant interceptors for this method then there's no point in checking the @InterceptorOrder
  | 
  |  

I missed the point that @InterceptorOrder is applicable at class level too. So i am not going to add this "improvement" in step#4. 

Other than that, with the rest of the changes, the unit tests in interceptors are passing.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223655#4223655

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223655