[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: New tree state model

[jason.greene@jboss.com]

"alesj" wrote : "david.lloyd at jboss.com" wrote : Just out of curiousity - what is wrong with the original linear state model? 
  | It's not able to support EJB state model,
  | which has some decision/condition after passivate state,
  | hence it's not plain linear.

This just sounds wrong. We should not be increasing the already high level of complexity in the MC by trying to make it into an EJB container.  Why does the MC have to manage anything associated with passivation?

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4224759#4224759

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4224759