[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: New tree state model

[alesj]

"jason.greene at jboss.com" wrote : 
  | We should not be increasing the already high level of complexity in the MC by trying to make it into an EJB container.
  | 
Where did you pick up this?
This is just a discussion/brainstorming about 
how to change current (limited) linear state model.

"jason.greene at jboss.com" wrote : Why does the MC have to manage anything associated with passivation?
This was just an example.
And since EJB actually builds upon MC, it's a real example.
Currently they have to do some tweaks/hacks to get around this problem.
With a tree based state model this would be trivial to do it properly.

"david.lloyd at jboss.com" wrote : 
  | anyway this doesn't seem to be the time to be redesigning core chunks of the MC
  | 
Who said this is gonna be done now? ;-)
This is a future roadmap feature, which Kabir got interested about.

Your two post are just steering this discussion off the target.
I would much rather see you added something useful on how
we should actually impl this new tree model,
then jumping on the thread when I simply mention EJB.
This is just not the way how MC dev forum should work. ;-)


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4224772#4224772

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4224772