[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Revisiting versioning for components

[jaikiran]

I agree, the fix version right now isn't clear enough for tracking issues.

anonymous wrote : 
  | Right now 'Fix Version' and 'Affects Version' reflects the version of ejb3-core which we are using.

I thought it reflected the version of as-int 

anonymous wrote : 
  | So at least for the three distributed artifacts I think we should have versions:
  | 1. as-int
  | 2. embedded
  | 3. plugin 

Any specific reason, we want to limit it to these 3? Maybe because this is the only 3 ways (currently) that we distribute EJB3? 


anonymous wrote : We now also have the option on using 'Component Fix Version(s)'.
So if a issue is reported against the "interceptors" component and fixed in 1.x.y version of the "interceptors" and the "interceptors" 1.x.y version is distributed through "as-int" version 1.a.b and "plugin" version 1.p.q, then we would mark it as:


  | Component/s: 	interceptors
  | Affects Version/s: 	None (what do we use here? the version of component or the distribution)
  | Fix Version/s: 	1.a.b, 1.p.q (Again how do we distinguish 1.a.b corresponds to as-int and 1.p.q to plugin)
  | 
  | Component Fix Version(s): 1.x.y (this corresponds to interceptors version) 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4225708#4225708

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4225708