[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: The DeploymentManager and ProfileService

[scott.stark@jboss.org]

"emuckenhuber" wrote : 
  | Hmm, there are some use cases where you don't need any repository.
  | For example the transient application profile managed by the DeploymentManager.
  | This will be just a hashMap containing the isCopyContent == false deployments, so that they
  | are also visible in the ManagementView.
  | But it's still a independent profile, which can be activated / deactivated by the DeploymentManager.
  | 
Ok, so an issue with that is how do we store admin edits of such profiles?

"emuckenhuber" wrote : 
  | Furthermore i think a VFS/uri does not make up a profile, as you still can could have a different (maybe static) profile,
  | where you create non-vfs based deployments - this is now also possible with the abstraction of ProfileDeployment (although not fully implemented)
  | 
Right, the profiles I'm working on don't have URIs either as they are described in terms of criteria that need to be resolved.

"emuckenhuber" wrote : 
  | Although i also think that there is something missing - but more in the sense of a ResourceDiscovery or ProfileSource.
  | Something where you can share the same source and don't need to maintain the profile root uris in each profile.
  | Maybe this also matches somehow to the work you want to do with a DeploymentRepository?
  | 
  | Can you provide some more information and/or use cases why you think this is not enough?
  | I mean maybe i'm just missing something :)
  | 
What's missing is a generic ProfileBootstrap that can have different ways of specifying subprofiles that should be included. For example, the deployers and base services would be specified via criteria, user apps specified via a uri to one or more apps defined in a jboss tools project. I'm going to review the changes in trunk tonight, but it is probably more of a notion of a resolver that I'm thinking of.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4206151#4206151

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4206151