[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Design of Portal Deployer

mwringe do-not-reply at jboss.com
Wed Feb 11 13:27:35 EST 2009


"alesj" wrote : "mwringe" wrote : 
  |   | But if we use the common metadata approach, this doesn't work as the deployer won't have access to the containers jars in its classpath, so I would still probably have to use the indirect reference method using the MC kernel.
  | I don't get it. :-)
  | 
  | How do you then get stuff from container?
  | Plain object and then hack over reflection? :-)
  | 
  | You need type safe model.
  | All the interfaces should be on deployers side,
  | only some impls at container side.
  | 
yes, that how it should work.
mwringe needs more coffee today.

"alesj" wrote : 
  | This should work with current flat cl model (or "big ball of mud"),
  | once we kick-in OSGi you should add more exact cl logic + move to proxy services.
  | 
  | But that's another story. :-)
Oh great, OSGi and manipulating jar manifest files, sounds like fun :P


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4209190#4209190

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4209190



More information about the jboss-dev-forums mailing list