[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Design of Portal Deployer
mwringe
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Wed Feb 11 13:27:35 EST 2009
"alesj" wrote : "mwringe" wrote :
| | But if we use the common metadata approach, this doesn't work as the deployer won't have access to the containers jars in its classpath, so I would still probably have to use the indirect reference method using the MC kernel.
| I don't get it. :-)
|
| How do you then get stuff from container?
| Plain object and then hack over reflection? :-)
|
| You need type safe model.
| All the interfaces should be on deployers side,
| only some impls at container side.
|
yes, that how it should work.
mwringe needs more coffee today.
"alesj" wrote :
| This should work with current flat cl model (or "big ball of mud"),
| once we kick-in OSGi you should add more exact cl logic + move to proxy services.
|
| But that's another story. :-)
Oh great, OSGi and manipulating jar manifest files, sounds like fun :P
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4209190#4209190
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4209190
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list