[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Some comments on Clebert's last commit

[clebert.suconic@jboss.com]

"timfox" wrote : Clebert - My understand is that your changes in your last commit should have *zero* run-time overhead for the standard message and not paging case, is this correct?
  | 
  | I just want to confirm that any code changes you made do not affect anything in the standard use case.

Just found what is likely the cause of this.

*Lots* of "JBM_ROUTE_TO:" are being added to the MessageHeader on QueueImpl::route, and that is being sent to the client.

On route, there is a comment saying this is is a temporary measure:


  | QueueImpl::route
  |       // Temp
  |       SimpleString routeToHeader = MessageImpl.HDR_ROUTE_TO_PREFIX.concat(name);
  | 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204423#4204423

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204423