[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MutableClassInfo?

[stale.pedersen@jboss.org]

"alesj" wrote : I still don't see why it has to be a MutableCI.
no reason besides the the one i postes above really. when i discussed this with Kabir we figured that people using Mutable* interfaces would probably work with Mutable objects, then it made sense to support both MCI and String. but what do you suggest? only String or CI? - as i said above, using CI doesnt give any value to the String parameter thats already there.

"alesj" wrote : 
  | Why isn't the one in MDR good enough?
  | Afaik AOP already uses MDR.
  | 
  | btw: there is a Javassist kind of Signature:
  |  - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-mdr/trunk/src/main/java/org/jboss/metadata/spi/signature/javassist/
  | I already use it in annotation scanning.
  | 
yup, that would work, but since it it only have CtMethod as an argument we either need to add a method to MMI (that again would use mdr) or add a method to mdr to support a MMI/MCI interface. personally i just feel that such a method is something that "belongs" in MMI/MCI, but its not a big thing either.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204924#4204924

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204924