[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: EJB3 managed component names and types

[ips]

After thinking about this some more, the instance metrics and invocation metrics for a given EJB3 SLSB are currently exposed via two different component instances, both of type EJB3:SLSB. This goes against the rule that all components of a given type should have the same signature (i.e. set of properties and operations). At least I think this should be a rule, and I think Scott is in agreement. Otherwise, clients end up needing to first query by type and then parse the returned component names to determine the component's "sub-type", rather than being able to query on the type alone.

So in this case, I think we should either have 

1) a single component type EJB3:SLSB with one component instance of that type per SLSB that exposes both instance and invocation metrics

or 

2) two component types EJB3:SLSB-instance and EJB3:SLSB-invocation with one component instance for each of these types per SLSB

Thoughts?


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236854#4236854

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236854