[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: Clustered DeploymentRepository for 5.1

[emuckenhuber]

I introduced a "applications" profile in trunk. But there is still one change to DeploymentManager outstanding.
Basically concerning loadProfile(ProfileKey, boolean allowHotDeployments).
I think the client should not be able to specify allowHotDeployments. Therefore the profileKey should be enough.

Furthermore there is now a defaultApplicationsKey - specifying the default profile where to deploy applications.
This would mean that in case you do loadProfile(new ProfileKey(ProfileKey.DEFAULT) - it will use this profile.

I've also introduced a MutableProfile, but it's basically used by default everywhere - i still need to implement that better. But this will happen most likely after beta1.

So what i would like to do is that only for MutableProfiles a deploymenRepository is required (because of the DeploymentManager). For an immutable profile this is therefore not needed. So we would also have some different implementations of a Profile then.
But i'm not really sure how this would affect your work?


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214120#4214120

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214120