[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Dependency on XB DefaultSchemaResolver

[alex.loubyansky@jboss.com]

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : What about MutableSchemaResolver as a name?

No problem.

anonymous wrote : Anyway, the JBossXBDeployerHelper looks like it should be maintained in JBossXB anyway?

I don't mind maintaining a helper class. Of course, deployer-specific bits should still be in the deployers project. If you or Ales want to refactor JBossXBDeployerHelper and extract a helper for the XB, I'll maintain it.

anonymous wrote : I guess the main reason why it is not, is because its providing some "VFS integration".
  | Maybe this could be more simply done by having a VFSInputSource?

That's an idea. Which project would it be in? Common? XB does not depend on VFS.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215282#4215282

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215282