[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Naming, @JNDI and OnDemand

[alesj]

"adrian at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | We need a standard annotation that is provided independent of the implementation.
  | AS integration project is here:
  | http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/integration/
  | as previously discussed on the dev list it is supposed to allow users to not have to
  | worry about the implemementations of how it is actually implemented.
  | e.g. in maven you import org.jboss.integration:naming not jnpserver or aop.argely untested, but you were in a hurry for me to commit it. :-)
  | 
Sure, the only problem I see is that we can end up with 1M sub-projects containing a single @annotation.

Perhaps some common integration annotations should be under the same sub-project.
e.g. org.jboss.integration:api or org.jboss.integration:annotations

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230483#4230483

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230483