[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: API modifications for better extensibility ?

[deruelle_jean]

"bstansberry at jboss.com" wrote : Hi Jean,
  | 
  | The code freeze for AS 5.1.0.GA is tomorrow and I'm on vacation, so the following is significantly colored by that. I can think about this more in a couple weeks when I get back, but once 5.1.0.GA is done there may not be a 5.2 as we move on to AS 6.
  | 
  | For AS 6 please open a JIRA to have another look at this design. I'm not comfortable with all these protected methods.
  | 

Thanks Brian ! Here it is https://64.74.196.157/jira/browse/JBAS-6933

"bstansberry at jboss.com" wrote : 
  | I do not want to expose startUnembedded. That is to support running in standalone Tomcat, which was a JIRA started in 2005 and never officially finished, not significantly tested in years etc. I don't want to make it part of this API. Does Mobicents run in standalone Tomcat?
  | 
  | Would prefer not exposing startEmbedded either.
  | 
  | If you *really need* start(Un)Embedded exposed, go ahead on Monday, but assume that there would be some change in AS 6; i.e. you and I will redesign this. And please be extremely careful as it's the code cutoff. :)
  | 

We run in standalone Tomcat indeed, but clustering is not advertised as supported or tested for it only for JBoss versions so we are fine and let it as is then.

"bstansberry at jboss.com" wrote : 
  | AbstractJBossCacheService
  | 
  | * make the storeSessionOwners protected so that we can reuse it
  | 
  | Feel free to make this a protected static method. However this change will not be in AS 5.1.0.GA as this would require a component update and we are past the deadline for component updates. A later Mobicents release of course could replace this jar with a later version. Which is why it's a separate jar. :)
  | 

Actually, I needed a different signature for this method for Mobicents so this is not needed anymore (sorry about the noise here)

"bstansberry at jboss.com" wrote : The above changes are svn r88986 in Branch_5_x. Not ported to trunk yet.
Thanks :-)

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231518#4231518

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231518