[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: Default VFS caching locations

[jason.greene@jboss.com]

"alesj" wrote : 
  | Or if the newly/additionally added "deploy" folder is not high volume,
  | does it still make sense to permanently cache it?
  | 

The problem is that the current deployers & VFS design is *very* dependent on permanent caching of VFS roots, per the discussion here:

http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2009-April/014187.html

So, anything which doesn't use it will eventually fail (unless they aren't using temps).



View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4232783#4232783

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4232783