[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss AS Development] - Re: JBAS-7469, move bootstrap class loading into profile

[emuckenhuber]

"scott.stark at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | I think this sould be part of the profile definition metadata and the current bootstrapURI processing replaced with the setup of a class loader bean deployment. I wanted to look more at the current bootstrap/embedded/shrinkwrap projects to what requirements exist along these lines.
  | 

Hmm yes i was thinking about adding additional information to the profile meta data as well - also related to virtual deployments. So it could make sense to do something like that replacing that.

In a different thread you were mentioning that deploy/ is a mess. It looks like the same is true for the common.lib folders as well. Most of the .jars would actually rather belong to a deployer or profile. Especially since classloading needs to process around 20MB everytime AS is started. This however seems to require moving more jboss deployments to a common location so that the distribution does not get too big.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4266558#4266558

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4266558