[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss AS Development] - Re: Naming over Remoting 3

david.lloyd@jboss.com do-not-reply at jboss.com
Mon Nov 23 18:04:09 EST 2009


"ron.sigal at jboss.com" wrote : point.connect()?  I.e., keep a repository of reusable connections, keyed on URI and OptionMap?

It seems inevitable that we'll need a connection pooling mechanism, but maybe it'd be better to do by name (e.g. a named index into a predefined connection configuration map), so you could, for example, have:


  |     Connection c = pool.getConnection("foobar");
  | 

Then if the named connection is configured but not connected, it would be connected; otherwise if it's already connected, the existing connection is returned.

This way you may have multiple, identical connections with different names, if that is desired.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4267175#4267175

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4267175



More information about the jboss-dev-forums mailing list